File #: 18-646    Version: 1 Name: City Council Resolution to Approve a General Fund Loan for repayment of attorneys fees between the City and MTLG, LLC
Type: Resolution - Council Status: Passed
In control: City Council
Meeting Date: 12/17/2018 Final action: 12/17/2018
Enactment date: 12/17/2018 Enactment #: Reso 2018-160
Title: RESOLUTION of the City of San Leandro City Council to Approve a General Fund Loan of $455,107.36 and the Loan Agreement, Promissory Note, and a Deed of Trust on 2539 Grant Avenue, San Leandro to Secure the Loan, between the City and MTLG, LLC
Sponsors: City Attorney, Rich Pio Roda
Attachments: 1. SLD - Loan Agreement Louis Rigaud 12.7.18, 2. SLD - Promissory Note Louis Rigaud 12.7.18, 3. SLD - Deed of Trust 2539 Grant Ave (Rigaud) 12.7.18
Title
RESOLUTION of the City of San Leandro City Council to Approve a General Fund Loan of $455,107.36 and the Loan Agreement, Promissory Note, and a Deed of Trust on 2539 Grant Avenue, San Leandro to Secure the Loan, between the City and MTLG, LLC

Body

WHEREAS, MTLG, LLC, the "Borrower," owns real property located at 2539 Grant Avenue, San Leandro, CA 94579, APN 80G-910-15 (the "Property"). The Property is 204,732 square feet, flag shaped, and is zoned IG. It is improved with a +(-) 13,382 square foot building. A broker's opinion obtained by the City May 2018 provided a value of between $7,800,000 to $8,100,000; and

WHEREAS, on April 1, 2013, the City approved Halus' proposed wind energy conversion project and height variance ("Project") to be located on the Property. On May 8, 2013, interested persons ("Petitioners") filed a writ of mandate pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") in Alameda County Superior Court, Case No. RG13677840, alleging that the City, in its regulatory capacity, failed to comply with CEQA and CEQA Guidelines in approving the Project (the "Litigation"). On April 14, 2014, the Alameda County Superior Court entered judgment in favor of the Petitioners, and the court issued a writ of mandate to the City. Thereafter, the court awarded Petitioners' counsel attorneys' fees. The City and Halus appealed the award of attorneys' fees, but on January 12, 2018, the Court of Appeal upheld the trial court's award of attorneys' fees and awarded Petitioner attorneys' fees for the appeal action; and

WHEREAS, Halus agreed to pay all costs incurred by the City in defending approval of the Project and related litigation. The City paid $186,382.25 for appeal fees and $232,425.65 in trial court fees, and Borrower owes the City an additional $36,299.46 in other outstanding fees (collectively, "Litigation Costs"); and


WHEREAS, the City paid the Litigation Costs, and Borrower has a...

Click here for full text