File #: 14-401    Version: 1 Name: Heron Bay Riprap - CSA with ESA
Type: Staff Report Status: Filed
In control: City Council
Meeting Date: 10/6/2014 Final action: 10/6/2014
Enactment date: Enactment #:
Title: Staff Report for a Resolution Approving a Consulting Services Agreement with Environmental Science Associates, Inc. (ESA), for the Environmental Clearance of the Heron Bay Shoreline Riprap Repair Project, Project No. 2006.0110
Sponsors: Uchenna Udemezue
Related files: 14-402
Title
Staff Report for a Resolution Approving a Consulting Services Agreement with Environmental Science Associates, Inc. (ESA), for the Environmental Clearance of the Heron Bay Shoreline Riprap Repair Project, Project No. 2006.0110

Staffreport
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Staff recommends approval of the Consultant Services Agreement (CSA) with Environmental Science Associates, Inc. (ESA) for the environmental clearance of the Heron Bay Shoreline Riprap Repair Project, Project No. 2006.0110.

BACKGROUND

The Heron Bay Maintenance Assessment District provides funding for the on-going maintenance of certain public facilities constructed as part of the Heron Bay residential development. These facilities include landscaping, storm water facilities, marshlands, and the Bay Trail areas. Due to tidal actions, the shoreline requires periodic maintenance to maintain protection of both the residential development and the Bay Trail, including the re-establishment of eroded shoreline areas.

Permits are required from several regulatory agencies, prior to performing work on the San Francisco Bay waterfront. These agencies include: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, National Marine Fisheries Service, San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board, Bay Conservation and Development Commission, and California Department of Fish and Wildlife. These permits and consultations are necessary to ensure the preservation of endangered species, and the general health of the bay waterfront.

Analysis

In January 2014, City staff sent out a request for proposal (RFP) to seven (7) environmental consultants for environmental clearance services for the subject project. Of the seven responses to the RFP sent for the subject project, only ESA responded with a proposal. On follow up inquiries with the consultants who were sent the RFP, they explained that their reason for declining submitting proposals was based on the complexity of th...

Click here for full text