File #: 17-297    Version: 1 Name: Staff Report Establishing the City’s Appropriation ( GANN ) Limit for Fiscal Year 2017-18
Type: Staff Report Status: Filed
In control: City Council
Meeting Date: 6/5/2017 Final action: 6/5/2017
Enactment date: Enactment #:
Title: Staff Report Establishing the City's Appropriation Limit for Fiscal Year 2017-18
Sponsors: David Baum Finance Director
Related files: 17-298

Title

Staff Report Establishing the City’s Appropriation Limit for Fiscal Year 2017-18

 

Staffreport

SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 

Staff recommends City Council approval of a resolution establishing the City’s appropriation limit for fiscal year 2017-18Staff has completed the calculations required for determining the City’s appropriation limit for 2017-18, which is $218,570,233.  Budget appropriations that are subject to the 2017-18 limitation total $104,360,051 which is $114,210,182 below the limit. 

 

BACKGROUND

 

On November 6, 1979, California voters passed Proposition 4.  Statutes clarifying certain provisions of the proposition are now codified in article XIIIB of the California Constitution.  This Article is commonly known as the “Gann Initiative.” The Initiative established constitutional spending limits allowable for California governmental agencies based on the Consumer Price Index and population growth.  Concurrent with Proposition 4, the Revenue and Taxation Code, Section 7910, requires each local governmental unit to establish its appropriations limit by the beginning of each fiscal year.

 

Due to Gann’s constraint on State and local governments to respond effectively to the demands of rapid growth around California, a legislative-business-labor coalition drafted and supported Proposition 111, which was adopted June 5, 1990.  Proposition 111 makes crucial adjustments to the Gann Initiative, by allowing it the flexibility to operate in a growing economy, while retaining its purpose in placing a limit on government spending. 

 

Prior law required spending limits to be tied to the Consumer Price Index or California Per Capita Personal Income growth factor, whichever was lower.  The new provisions allow an agency to select the California Per Capita Personal Income growth factor or the Non-residential Property Assessed Valuation growth factor, whichever is higher.  Cities may choose to use the percentage rate of change in population within the City or county, whichever is higher.

 

ANALYSIS

 

The Appropriation Limit for prior fiscal years was predominantly based on the county population factor multiplied by the assessed valuation change factor.  After the passage of Proposition 111, cities are able to use the higher of the population factors (City or county) and the higher of the California per capita personal income factor or the Non-residential Property Assessed Valuation growth factor.  This amended approach has been applied to fiscal years 1990-91 through 2010-11 to recalculate the ending limits.  The revised calculations will continue to be applied in subsequent years.

 

For fiscal year 2017-18 staff is using the County Population Growth factor of 0.99% multiplied by the Non-residential assessed value factor 6.25% since the county’s population factor is higher than the City of San Leandro’s population factor of 0.45%.  Similarly, the City’s non-residential new construction growth factor of 6.25% is higher than the State of California per capita income factor of 3.69%.  The non-residential assessed valuation factor for 2017-18 includes “new construction” of $32 million for San Leandro Tech Campus (SLTC LLC) Phase I,  132,000 square foot office building and parking facility

 

The calculated 2016-17 Appropriation Limit of $203,693,435 multiplied by the adjustment factor of 1.0730 produces the 2017-18 Appropriation Limit of $218,570,233.  A Resolution is attached which authorizes the new Appropriation Limit for next fiscal year and includes the Attachment 1 Calculation.  The actual budget subject to the limitation excludes self-supporting funds, capital improvement funds, capital outlay grant funds and specific exclusions such as the Gas Tax Fund.  The fiscal year 2017-18 appropriation subject to the Gann Limit is $104,360,051 and is significantly below the Appropriation Limit by over $114 million.

 

Current City Council Policy

The Council adopts the appropriation limit during the budget adoption process.

 

Fiscal Impact

None.  Impacts the City only if the appropriation limit is exceeded by the proposed fiscal year 2017-18 appropriation subject to limitation.

 

Attachments

                     Attachment 1 - Gann Appropriation Limitation Calculation 2017-18

 

CONCLUSION

 

Staff recommends City Council approval of a resolution establishing the City’s appropriation limit of $218,570,233 for fiscal year 2017-18.

                     

 

PREPARED BY:  David Baum, Finance Director, Finance