Title
Public Hearing to Recommend Certification of the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Bay Fair Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) Specific Plan and to Recommend to the City Council Adoption of the Bay Fair TOD Specific Plan
Staffreport
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION
The proposed Bay Fair Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) Specific Plan is the culmination of a comprehensive public planning process that formally began in 2016 and has taken over 2 years. The Bay Fair TOD Specific Plan (Specific Plan) establishes a 20 year long-term “vision for a sustainable, vibrant, walkable, and safe transit-oriented village with a diversity of land uses serving residents, workers, and visitors.” An environmental impact report (EIR) is required under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as part of the proposed Specific Plan. See Exhibit A for the Plan Area map and boundaries.
The Planning Commission is considering tonight two resolutions related to the Bay Fair TOD Specific Plan: the first resolution (PC Resolution 2018-001) recommends that the City Council certify the Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR). The second resolution (PC Resolution 2018-002) recommends that the City Council adopt the Specific Plan. Upon final adoption of the Specific Plan by the City Council, the Addendum will be integrated or phased into a Final Specific Plan document for public and City use.
At its fourth and final meeting on October 23, 2017, the Bay Fair TOD Specific Plan Community Advisory Committee (CAC) reviewed the Draft Specific Plan and voted 14-0 (with 7 members absent) to affirm its support of the Draft Plan and its comprehensiveness to the Planning Commission and City Council (see Exhibit B, Draft Minutes of the October 23, 2017 CAC Meeting).
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve both resolutions. Following the Planning Commission’s recommendations, the City Council is tentatively scheduled to consider the FEIR and Specific Plan at its February 20, 2018 regular meeting.
BACKGROUND
In 2014, the City of San Leandro applied for and received a highly competitive $440,000 Priority Development Area (PDA) planning grant from the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC). The City also contributed $50,000 ($40,000 in cash and $10,000 of in-kind staff time) to match the grant along with contributions of $15,000 each from BART and Madison Marquette (the owner of the Bayfair Center). BART, Madison Marquette and Alameda County entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the City in 2014 to memorialize their roles as project partners in the creation of the Specific Plan and their funding and in-kind staff time commitments.
In 2015, the City issued a Request for Proposals from qualified planning firms to serve as lead consultant for the Specific Plan. The City selected Berkeley-based Raimi + Associates.
In late 2015, the City initiated a Community Advisory Committee (CAC) application process. After receiving 61 applications, in 2016 the City Council approved a 21 member CAC, of which 4 members were from unincorporated Alameda County. The CAC members represented local stakeholders in the City and County with diverse backgrounds. The City also established a 10 member Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) consisting of staff from the City’s Planning Services Division and Engineering/Transportation Department, AC Transit, Alameda County Planning & Flood Control, Alameda County Transportation Commission, Association of Bay Area Governments , BART, Caltrans, and Madison Marquette. Both the CAC and TAC were required to be established under the MTC planning grant.
In addition to promoting the long-term sustainability and vibrancy of the Bay Fair BART Station area, the importance of the City establishing a TOD (or Priority Development Area/PDA) Specific Plan include: 1) greater access to public funding targeted to TOD areas, 2) incentivizing/streamlining the regulatory process for future TOD developments, 3) continuing City and private investments in South San Leandro, and 4) adding the final planning piece to the City’s East 14th Street corridor, following the East 14th South Area Strategy (2004) and the Downtown TOD Strategy (2007), all in compliance with MTC’s regional Plan Bay Area 2040. MTC initially adopted the regional Plan Bay Area in 2013, and updated it in 2017, to address State mandated land use, transportation and greenhouse gas emissions goals and requirements under Senate Bill (SB) 375 (2008).
The 2035 General Plan, which the City adopted in September 2016, created a new land use (as well as land use map) designation, Bay Fair Transit-Oriented Development (B-TOD), in anticipation of the eventual completion of the Bay Fair TOD Specific Plan. The Specific Plan is intended to implement, and improve upon, the guidance provided in the City’s 2035 General Plan.
ANALYSIS
The Bay Fair TOD Specific Plan Area (“Specific Plan Area”) is at the southeastern edge of San Leandro, adjacent to unincorporated Alameda County. It includes Bay Fair BART Station, Bayfair Center, East 14th street and Hesperian Boulevard corridors, and a small number of residential uses. The Specific Plan Area is surrounded in most directions by single-family neighborhoods. Further beyond, the area is near three freeways (I-580, I-238, and I-880).
The Bay Fair TOD Specific Plan Area has a total acreage of 154 acres, with a majority of its land designated towards retail and commercial uses. The remaining portion contains a mix of uses including office, light industrial, and residential. The study area has different sub areas (such as Bay Fair BART Station, Bayfair Center, Fashion Faire Place, and Fairmont Square Shopping Center), which are divided by two intersecting corridors (East 14th Street and Hesperian Boulevard).
The proposed Specific Plan contains the following chapters:
• The Introduction and Context chapter (Chapter 1) describes the Specific Plan Area conditions and context, the purpose of the document, and the community engagement and plan development process.
• The Vision and Planning Framework chapter (Chapter 2) provides the long-term vision and desired outcomes for the Specific Plan Area.
• The Mobility chapter (Chapter 3) presents the circulation network and design concepts that are intended to improve connections and enhance walkability along and across existing corridors. Transportation demand management and parking are also addressed in this Chapter.
• The Land Use and Housing chapter (Chapter 4) provides policy direction for the range of future land uses envisioned for the Specific Plan Area. The chapter also includes more detailed policies for housing, affordable housing and anti-displacement.
• The Development Standards and Guidelines chapter (Chapter 5) provides development standards and guidelines that apply to all future private development projects and major rehabilitation projects in the Bay Fair TOD Specific Plan Area, as well as to new publicly funded improvements. The following topics are addressed: building frontages; height limits and transitions; building and site design; open space; and fences and signs.
• The Infrastructure and Services chapter (Chapter 6) includes policies for the provision of wet and dry infrastructure as well as services such as police, fire, and waste collection.
• The Implementation and Financing chapter (Chapter 7) presents the programs and physical improvements to achieve the Specific Plan’s vision. The chapter lists funding sources to implement the Plan’s programs and improvements.
Desired Outcomes
Chapter 2 of the Specific Plan includes the following desired outcomes (see Exhibit A to PC Resolution 2018-002):
1. More Parks and Open Space. Increase the amount of parks, green space, plazas, and other public space that encourages pedestrian activity, recreation, and access to nature.
2. More Walkable Environment. Improve the pedestrian experience, public space, aesthetics, and design quality throughout the Specific Plan Area to attract visitors, serve residents and promote walking.
3. Better Mobility and Connectivity. Improve pedestrian, bicycle, transit, and vehicle connections in the Specific Plan Area through the creation of an interconnected street grid, with a focus on better pedestrian connections between the Bay Fair BART station and the adjacent shopping areas.
4. Improved Safety and Less Crime. Improve safety in and around the Specific Plan Area through a range of strategies including increased pedestrian activity; more “eyes on the street;” enhanced and more coordinated policing; better lighting pathways; activation of vacant spaces; and an increased sense of ownership and stewardship by residents, workers, and visitors.
5. Compatibility with Adjacent Neighborhoods. Ensure compatibility with the residential neighborhoods adjacent to the Specific Plan Area - including those in unincorporated Alameda County as well as the City of San Leandro - and encourage sensitive design transitions, public amenities, and uses and services that benefit surrounding neighborhoods.
6. Diversity of Uses. Support a diverse, sustainable mix of uses including retail, housing, workplaces, and community spaces. Encourage a variety of essential goods and services such as grocery stores, pharmacies, banks, social services, restaurants, and other businesses.
7. Diverse and Affordable Housing. Support both market rate and affordable housing, and seek to protect existing residents from involuntary displacement.
8. Range of Educational Opportunities. Provide a range of services to provide opportunities for higher education, business incubation, and vocational and employment training programs for all age groups.
9. Community Facilities. Provide community facilities necessary to support the level and type of additional growth, including schools, community and senior centers, child care centers, and public safety facilities.
10. Efficient and Shared Parking. Implement parking management solutions that most efficiently use parking resources, including sharing of public and private parking spaces between different uses and sharing between different use types such as residential, office, and commercial.
11. BART and Bus Station Improvement. Support and improve the Bay Fair BART and bus stations as integral amenities for the surrounding neighborhoods, the City, the County, and the region.
12. Zoning Aligned with Community Vision. Ensure future zoning is aligned with the community vision, while allowing flexibility to adjust to changing trends and land ownership.
13. Local and Regional Destination. Provide excellent public space, outdoor dining, and dynamic retail experiences to create central gathering places that serve local and regional populations.
14. Infrastructure. Improve and maintain basic infrastructure such as stormwater management facilities, flood control, and water, sewer, and gas service.
15. Environmental Sustainability. Create a sustainable urban environment that incorporates green building features, green infrastructure and ecology, sustainable energy systems, water efficiency and conservation, and sustainable transportation systems.
Planning Framework
Per Chapter 2 of the Specific Plan, the following strategies are integrated throughout and provide a “big-picture” planning framework for the plan (see Exhibit A to PC Resolution 2018-002):
1. Improve Mobility for all Modes along Existing Major Streets
The Specific Plan outlines a series of multi-modal improvements such as adding bicycle lanes, reducing vehicle travel lanes, creating new street and a pedestrian path network to improve connectivity throughout the Plan Area.
2. Strengthen New Connections to BART
Better connectivity in the Plan Area to the BART station and all users including vehicles, transit users, pedestrians and bicyclists, but with priority for pedestrians and bicyclists.
3. Create a Grid of Smaller Blocks
Smaller block sizes, in contrast to the large expanses of surface parking in the existing major retail areas such as Bayfair Center, promote the publicly desired “village” and “neighborhood” scale and character for the Plan Area. Blocks should generally not be longer than 400 to 500 feet.
4. Create Special, Memorable Public Places and Open Spaces
Create attractive public spaces that are accessible to people in various life stages (including households with kids, teens, seniors, and persons with physical disabilities).
5. Enable Range of Future Scenarios
The Specific Plan illustrates three potential future development scenarios that could occur in the next 20 years under the Specific Plan’s recommendations and guidelines. Note that these scenarios are vision concepts, which may not occur exactly as shown because future development will be dictated by market forces, landowner decisions, and the capacity for needed infrastructure improvements:
• Scenario 1 (see Figure 2.7 - “Retail/Residential Potential Scenario”) shows a future re-design and reconfiguration of the Bayfair Center and residential development primarily around its fringes.
• Scenario 2 [see Figure 2.8 - “Retail/Residential Potential Scenario (Higher Density)”] shows a higher density version of Scenario 1.
• Scenario 3 (see Figure 2.9 - “Residential/Office/Retail Potential Scenario”) shows a flexible mix of residential, office, retail and open spaces.
Chapter 3: Mobility (see Exhibit A to PC Resolution 2018-002)
The “Local Street Network” section recommends new local street and bicycle/ pedestrian connections. The “Local Bicycle Network” section shows bicycle connections through and beyond the Plan Area, including the anticipated regional East Bay Greenway,and identifies design standards and potential locations for bike lane classifications such as Class II buffered lanes and Class IV separated lanes. The Local Transit Network section recommends a transit priority local street and includes bus accommodations/placement guidance and standards.
This chapter also demonstrates proposed design guidelines for the key existing arterial and collector streets of East 14th Street, Fairmont Drive, and Hesperian Boulevard. There are also recommended standards and guidelines that emphasize activated and attractively designed and scaled sidewalks and public frontages. Private and public parking standards are also discussed in this chapter, along with transportation demand management strategies and actions such as residential unbundled parking and car share memberships for new tenants, employer provided bike support facilities like showers/changing rooms, and flex work schedules. The public parking guidelines section has an emphasis on shared parking among different land uses. Key recommended private parking requirements include the following minimum parking standards:
• Office - minimum 1 space/1,000 square feet (with less than 5,000 SF offices to be exempt)
• Residential - minimum 0.5 space/unit and maximum 1 space/unit for studios and 1-bedrooms; minimum 0.75 spaces/unit and maximum 1.5 space/unit (for 2 or more bedrooms
• Retail - minimum 2 spaces/1,000 SF (with less than 5,000 SF retail to be exempt)
Chapter 4: Land Use + Housing (see Exhibit A to PC Resolution 2018-002)
One single B-TOD Zoning District is proposed in the Specific Plan for the entire Plan Area. The wide-ranging lists of recommended permitted, conditionally permitted, administratively permitted and temporarily permitted uses are in Chapter 4 of the Specific Plan. Notable land use policies include a diverse mix of land uses, retail preservation, school and childcare, entertainment/dining, grocery store, services and amenities, new parks and public space. Land uses not allowed in the Plan Area include new single family residential, auto services/sales, drive-thru businesses, low intensity commercial (e.g., equipment service/sales, storage), and industrial (e.g., warehouses, trucking, recycling, hazardous materials)
Chapter 5: Development Standards + Guidelines (see Exhibit A to PC Resolution 2018-002)
Two notable components of Chapter 5 of the Specific Plan are building heights and transitions to existing development. Building height ranges are classified within three areas of the Plan Area and range from a maximum of 50 feet to a maximum of 90 feet. The Specific Plan focuses the tallest buildings close to BART and away from residential neighborhoods.
For transitions to existing development, the Specific Plan proposes two different height transition overlay areas: Residential Transition and Corridor transition Overlays. The Residential Transition Overlay requires future development to step down toward single-family residential neighborhoods to protect privacy and solar exposure. The Corridor Transition Overlay requires a scaling down to both East 14th Street and Hesperian Boulevard to sensitively transition to existing nearby retail, office and/or residential uses.
Addendum (see Exhibit B to PC Resolution 2018-002)
An Addendum has been prepared identifying line text edits to the Draft Specific Plan, which was publicly released on September 28, 2017. The Addendum responds to comments on the Draft Specific Plan received internally (from City staff and/or Raimi + Associates) and from the public, local business community, City Council, Planning Commission, CAC, TAC, and public agencies. There were 21 written comments received since September 28, 2017 on the Draft Specific Plan, but the Addendum addresses the ones which are substantive and correct errors and omissions.
Next Steps
The City Council is tentatively scheduled to consider the Planning Commission’s recommendations regarding the Specific Plan and related EIR on February 20, 2018.
GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE
Policy LU-6.13 [Under Chapter 3, Land Use] Bay Fair Area.
Transform the area around the Bay Fair BART station, including Bayfair Center, other shopping centers, and properties along Hesperian, East 14th, and other major arterials, into a dynamic new transit oriented development area. Future development in this area should reposition Bayfair Center to reflect current trends in retailing; add a mix of higher-density residential, office, and other commercial uses; maximize the potential for BART use; and minimize dependence on autos for daily trips.
Action LU-8.10.A: Bay Fair Station Transit Village
Complete the Bay Fair BART Transit Village Specific Plan now underway. The Plan should outline a vision for the area’s future development, include standards and guidelines for future development, and present a strategy for achieving desired end results. Following its adoption, undertake rezoning and capital improvements to facilitate implementation.
Action LU-8.10.B: East 14th Street Streetscape Improvements
Work collaboratively with Alameda County to improve East 14th Street in the Bay Fair area to make the area more attractive, distinctive, and friendly to pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit users.
Action LU-8.10C: Bay Fair BART Connections
Improve the pedestrian and bicycle connection between the Bay Fair BART Station, adjacent transit waiting areas, Bayfair Center, and nearby neighborhoods and shopping districts.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The City prepared a Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Specific Plan. The document is a “program level” EIR, which addresses the general effects of additional population and employment in the City over a 20 year period rather than the effects of a particular development project on a particular site. The DEIR includes a project description, discussions of the existing setting, potential environmental impacts, mitigation measures, and alternatives to the proposed Specific Plan. The 14 environmental issue areas that were analyzed include: aesthetics; air quality; biological resources; cultural resources; geology and soils; greenhouse gas emissions; hazards and hazardous materials; hydrology and water quality; land use and planning; noise; population and housing; public services, schools, and recreation; transportation and traffic; and utilities and service systems.
The Draft Specific Plan and Draft EIR (DEIR) were both publicly released on September 28, 2017. The Notice of Availability (NOA) of the DEIR was filed with the State Clearinghouse, and interested parties were notified by email of the 45-day public comment period (October 6 - November 20) for submitting written comments on the DEIR. The City also published the NOA in the Daily Review on October 6, emailed the NOA notice to over 450 people/organizations on the Bay Fair TOD Plan interested parties list, and mailed NOA notices to property owners within 1,000 feet of the Plan Area.
After the end of the 45-day public comment period a Final EIR (FEIR) was released on January 5, 2018. The FEIR includes Responses to Comments on the Draft EIR, DEIR text revisions, and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP). Chapter 2 of the FEIR is the Responses to Comments chapter (see Exhibit B to PC Resolution 2018-001). Three public/quasi-public agencies provided written comments: BART, Alameda County Public Works, and Alameda County Transportation Commission. The remaining six came from Target (business/corporations), Friends of San Leandro Creek (community group), and the following individuals: Ben Ball, Charles Hintz, Hisako Hintz, and Sotera McKimmey.
The FEIR, in combination with the DEIR, constitute the Final Environmental Impact Report. Certification of the Final EIR must occur before the City Council may adopt the Bay Fair TOD Specific Plan. The Planning Commission will provide recommendations on both the FEIR and Final Specific Plan, including the Addendum, tonight.
Potential Development Capacity and DEIR Project Description
The proposed project is adoption of the Bay Fair Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Specific Plan. The proposed Specific Plan includes policies and development standards to guide future development in the Specific Plan Area within the City of San Leandro. The proposed Specific Plan is intended to implement the guidance provided in the City’s 2035 General Plan. The 2035 General Plan envisions Bay Fair as a dynamic, walkable, transit-oriented area with a mix of uses - including retail, office, higher density housing, and open space - that leverage their prime location near BART.
A reasonable and conservative estimate of buildout associated with the General Plan through 2035 would include development of 2,540 housing units and 300,000 square feet of office space, as well as the removal of an estimated 161,000 square feet of retail space.
Table 1 on Page 5 of the DEIR (see Exhibit A for PC Resolution 2018-001) provides a Summary of Environmental Impacts, Mitigation Measures, and Residual Impacts. The following is a brief summary of each environmental issue discussed in the DEIR.
Aesthetics
The DEIR analyzes how the implementation of the Specific Plan would affect the visual environment. Overall, the impacts of the Plan were found to be less than significant without mitigation.
Air Quality
The DEIR analyzes how implementation of the Specific Plan would create potential local and regional air quality impacts. Per Impact AQ-1 in Table 1 in the DEIR, buildout of the proposed Specific Plan would result in the temporary generation of air pollutants during construction, which would affect local air quality. Compliance with the BAAQMD Basic Construction Mitigation Measures would require future projects within the Specific Plan Area to implement measures to reduce construction emissions. Impacts would be significant but mitigable. All other impacts of the Plan were found to be less than significant without mitigation.
Biological Resources
Implementation of the Specific Plan could impact existing biological resources, including animal and plant species, vegetation, and federally protected wetlands. These impacts would be less than significant but mitigable through mitigation measures, when applicable, including biological resources screening and assessment; special status plant species surveys, mitigation, and restoration/monitoring; endangered/threatened species habitat assessments and protocol surveys; a worker environmental awareness program; jurisdictional delineations, and native amphibian protection.
Cultural Resources
None of the historic resources listed in the City’s 2035 General Plan are in the Specific Plan Area. However, many of the existing developments in the Plan Area date back to the 1950s. The impacts on cultural, tribal cultural and paleontological resources would be less than significant with recommended mitigation measures, when applicable, such as retaining a historian or archaeologist to document/assess the historical built environment, archaeological resources, and paleontological resources.
Geology and Soils
Impacts of the Specific Plan on exposure to seismic activity, substantial soil erosion/loss of topsoil, expansive soil, and septic tank/alternative wastewater systems were found to be less than significant without mitigation.
Hazards and Hazardous Materials
While implementation of the Specific Plan does not include land uses that would emit harmful types or levels of emissions or handle hazardous materials (like those associated with industrial areas) especially near schools, it could result in the routine transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials in close proximity to residential development, commercial business or other population centers. However, adherence to existing regulations, programs and 2035 General Plan policies would ensure that impacts of the Specific Plan are less than significant without mitigation.
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
The Specific Plan implementation would not generate GHG emissions that would directly or indirectly have a significant impact on the environment. Also, the Specific Plan is consistent with the City’s Climate Action Plan and the regional Plan Bay Area 2040. Therefore, impacts related to GHG would be less than significant without mitigations.
Hydrology and Water Quality
Implementation of the Specific Plan could potentially have impacts on hydrology and water quality, but compliance with required permits and existing regulations (such as C.3 provisions of the Alameda County Clean Water Program for on-site infiltration systems) reduces this potential to a less than significant without mitigation level.
Land Use
The proposed Specific Plan would implement and be consistent with the goals and policies of the 2035 General Plan, therefore the impacts on land use would be less than significant without mitigation.
Noise
Residents and businesses in the vicinity of development allowed by the proposed Specific Plan could be exposed to significant construction-related noise and vibration during the excavation and foundation work associated with projects that implement the Specific Plan. However, mitigation measures such as the City’s implementation as Standard Conditions of Approval or Construction Development Standards for new construction in the City (e.g., limiting construction hours on weekdays and weekends, posting construction contact info on-site, limiting unnecessary engine idling, maintaining and tuning all equipment to minimize noise, and using low-emission equipment) would make the impacts less than significant. All other impacts on noise have been identified as less than significant without mitigation.
Population and Housing
Implementation of the proposed Specific Plan may lead to growth within the Specific Plan Area that could add up to 2,540 residential units and an estimated 7,239 residents and 725 jobs to the Specific Plan Area by 2035. However, the proposed Specific Plan would not cause substantial population growth in the City. Also, implementation of the Specific Plan would not displace substantial numbers of existing housing units or people since it will likely result in increased housing. Impacts would be less than significant without mitigation.
Public Services, Schools, and Recreation
Implementation of the proposed Specific Plan would introduce development intensity and population growth in the Specific Plan Area, generating additional need for fire and police services; however, compliance with the City’s 2035 General Plan policies and actions would ensure impacts to fire and police protection services would be less than significant.
Implementation of the proposed Specific Plan would add an estimated 1,778 students to the Specific Plan Area. However, with payment of state-mandated school impact fees, impacts related to public school operating capacity would be less than significant.
Implementation of the proposed Specific Plan would add an estimated 2,540 residential units and an estimated 7,239 residents to the Specific Plan Area, which would increase use of recreational facilities and contribute to their physical deterioration. Payment of in-lieu public park fees and the establishment of new open space areas within the Specific Plan Area would reduce impacts to a less than significant level.
Transportation and Traffic
Increases in traffic in the Specific Plan Area under cumulative (year 2035) conditions compared to growth anticipated under the existing 2035 General Plan would cause intersection operating conditions to exceed one or more significance thresholds at three signalized study area intersections. The following mitigation would reduce impacts at the Hesperian Boulevard/Halcyon Drive/Fairmont Drive and East 14th Street/Fairmont Drive intersections:
• Mitigation Measure (MM) T-1: Hesperian Boulevard/Halcyon Drive/Fairmont Drive
The City of San Leandro shall implement a signal timing improvement project within the coordinated signal group for the intersection of Hesperian Boulevard and Halcyon Drive. The improvement shall occur when the proposed road diet on Hesperian Boulevard is implemented.
• MM T-2: East 14th Street/Fairmont Drive
The City of San Leandro shall coordinate with Caltrans to implement a signal timing improvement project within the coordinated signal group for the intersection of East 14th Street and Fairmont Drive by funding actual cost. This mitigation measure is to occur when new projects within the Specific Plan Area generate a cumulative total of approximately 350 AM peak hour trips.
However, no feasible mitigation measures are available to reduce impacts at the Hesperian Boulevard/Thornally Drive intersection, and the East 14th Street/Fairmont Drive intersection because such intersections are within Caltrans control and the City cannot guarantee implementation of mitigations. Therefore, impacts at these intersections would be significant and unavoidable.
Development facilitated by the Specific Plan would increase traffic on Alameda CTC Congestion Management Program (CMP) freeways and arterial segments under cumulative (year 2040) conditions. No significant impacts would occur at CMP freeway segments. However, four arterial segments would exceed one or more CMP Thresholds, and there are no feasible improvements that could be implemented within the available right-of-way that would reduce the impacts. Therefore, impacts at these segments would be significant and unavoidable.
Additionally, the increase in vehicle delay at the intersection of Hesperian Boulevard and Thornally Drive referenced above would also cause significant operational delay for buses approaching the intersection. Therefore, impacts to bus operation would be significant and unavoidable.
Utilities and Infrastructure
Potential impacts will occur from the proposed Specific Plan on utilities and services including water, wastewater, stormwater and solid waste. Because existing water, wastewater and solid waste facilities have adequate capacity to handle the projected buildout of the Specific Plan Area, the impacts are less than significant without mitigation.
Alternatives
Chapter 6 of the DEIR analyzes alternatives to the proposed project. Three alternatives to the proposed project were considered:
1) Alternative 1: No Project/ 2035 General Plan Buildout
2) Alternative 2: Residential Focus Alternative
3) Alternative 3: Office Focus Alternative
The Office Focus Alternative (Alternative 3) would be considered the environmentally superior alternative, as it would reduce impacts related to traffic and utilities, due primarily to the reduction in housing units. However, this alternative would not eliminate the significant and unavoidable impact at the intersection of Hesperian Boulevard and Thornally Drive. No mitigation measures are available to reduce the impact in the available right-of-way without removal of bike lanes. Therefore, the impact to this intersection would remain significant and unavoidable under Alternative 3. In addition, the impact at Hesperian Boulevard south of East 14th Street would remain significant and unavoidable, similar to the proposed Specific Plan. Because of the significant traffic impacts, the significant impacts related to transit operations would also remain under this Alternative 3. This alternative would generally meet most of the project objectives, but would meet Objective 6 (to provide a diversity of uses) to a lesser degree than the proposed project.
PUBLIC OUTREACH
The City implemented a broad public outreach effort to solicit thorough community and public input throughout the Specific Plan planning process. As required under the MTC planning grant, the City created at the onset a Community Involvement Strategy that explained its proposed outreach process to ensure broader public engagement. The City also created a Bay Fair TOD Plan webpage on the City’s website, which has been regularly updated. (<https://www.sanleandro.org/depts/cd/project_updates/bftod/default.asp>).
There have been 5 City Council public meetings to date:
• December 1, 2014 (approval to execute the MTC PDA Planning grant agreement and Memorandum of Understanding between the City, BART, Alameda County and Madison Marquette for the Bay Fair TOD Specific Plan)
• May 18, 2015 (approved Raimi + Associates contract)
• February 1, 2016 (approval of 21 member Community Advisory Committee)
• May 23, 2016 (Work Session on Draft Scenarios)
• March 13, 2017 (Presentation on Draft Plan update)
There have been 4 Planning Commission public meetings to date:
• August 20, 2015 (Overview of the Bay Fair TOD Plan process)
• May 19, 2016 (Work Session on Draft Scenarios)
• March 16, 2017 (Notice of Preparation for an EIR Scoping Meeting)
• January 18, 2018 (Review of Final Specific Plan and FEIR)
There were also presentations with the following City Boards/Commissions: Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee, Board of Zoning Adjustments, Senior Commission and Youth Advisory Commission. Also, City staff also updated the City Council Facilities and Transportation Committee, San Leandro Chamber of Commerce, Washington Homeowners Association, Floresta Neighborhood Association, African American Business Council, Asian Business Council, and Alameda County Eden Area Livability Initiative Group. The City also conducted a roundtable meeting on October 27, 2016 with developers and realtors to better understand the current and future residential, commercial and retail market. There were also two information pop-up stations that the City set-up in the Bay Fair BART Station (November 8, 2016) and Bayfair Center (December 6, 2016) to survey users about the proposed Specific Plan.
There were four TAC and CAC meetings over the last 2 years. There were also two widely publicized community workshops: the first one on September 21, 2016 provided an overview of the planning process to date and involved an interactive open house with topical and interactive stations to solicit public feedback on the proposed vision statement, desired outcomes, desired land uses, preliminary development scenarios, and preliminary street/intersection design improvements. The second workshop on October 18, 2017 presented notable content from the Draft Specific Plan and sought public input.
The City also maintained an interested party email distribution list of over 450 individuals composed of City and nearby Alameda County residents, businesses, property owners, and community organizations, as well as public agencies. Other means of outreach the City utilized during the planning process included press releases, Weekly Updates to City Council, and online postings on the City blog, SL Next, and the community network Nextdoor.
Notice of tonight’s Planning Commission was published in the Daily Review on January 5 and posted on the City website. Beginning in October 2017, the City also increased the mailing notification for the NOA, community workshop #2, and tonight’s Planning Commission meeting from 500 feet to 1000 feet from the Plan Area to expand public outreach. The City also emailed notice of tonight’s meeting to the Specific Plan interested party email list.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachments to Staff Report
• Exhibit A - Bay Fair TOD Specific Plan Area Map
• Exhibit B - Draft Minutes of the October 23,, 2017 CAC Meeting
Attachments to PC Resolution No. 2018-001 Recommending Certification of the Environmental Impact Report for the Bay Fair TOD Specific Plan
• Exhibit A - Draft EIR for the Bay Fair TOD Specific Plan (publicly released on September 28, 2017
• Exhibit B - Final EIR for the Bay Fair TOD Specific Plan (publicly released on January 5, 2018)
(Note: Exhibits A and B above may also be found online at <https://www.sanleandro.org/depts/cd/project_updates/bftod/pd/default.asp> or you may view copies of them at the Community Development Department in City Hall and the Main Library.)
Attachments to PC Resolution No. 2018-002 Recommending that the City Council Adopt the Bay Fair TOD Specific Plan
• Exhibit A - Draft Bay Fair TOD Specific Plan (publicly released on September 28, 2017)
• Exhibit B - Bay Fair TOD Specific Plan Addendum (publicly released on January 5, 2018)
(Note: Exhibits A and B above may also be found online at <https://www.sanleandro.org/depts/cd/project_updates/bftod/pd/default.asp> or you may view copies of them at the Community Development Department in City Hall and the Main Library.)
PREPARED BY: Tom Liao, Deputy Community Development Director