File #: 19-490    Version: 1 Name: Repeal of Intimidating Solitiation Ordinance
Type: Staff Report Status: Filed
In control: City Council
Meeting Date: 9/16/2019 Final action: 9/16/2019
Enactment date: Enactment #:
Title: Staff Report for a City of San Leandro City Council Ordinance Repealing San Leandro Municipal Code Title 4, Chapter 4-1, Article 9 Pertaining to Intimidating Solicitation
Sponsors: Liz Warmerdam
Related files: 19-491
Title
Staff Report for a City of San Leandro City Council Ordinance Repealing San Leandro Municipal Code Title 4, Chapter 4-1, Article 9 Pertaining to Intimidating Solicitation

Staffreport
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Staff recommends that the City Council introduce an Ordinance repealing Title 4, Chapter 4-1, Article 9 of the San Leandro Municipal Code Pertaining to Intimidating Solicitation.

BACKGROUND

In 2004, the City Council adopted an ordinance pertaining to intimidating solicitation, codified as Title 4, Chapter 4-1, Article 9 of the San Leandro Municipal Code ("Intimidating Solicitation Ordinance"). The ordinance makes it unlawful for any person to engage in intimidating solicitation behavior in any public place and unlawful to solicit, ask or beg in certain public places. In 2018, the City Council provided direction to staff and the City Attorney's Office to review the City's Intimidating Solicitation Ordinance.

Analysis

Consistent with the City Council's direction, staff and the City Attorney's Office reviewed the City's Intimidating Solicitation Ordinance, which included an analysis of the legal landscape regarding intimidating solicitation regulations. Under United States Supreme Court precedent, solicitation (including panhandling) is protected by the First Amendment. Since the City's Intimidating Solicitation Ordinance was adopted in 2004, First Amendment case law has evolved. Under current jurisprudence, any law or regulation affecting intimidating solicitation must be viewed under a strict scrutiny analysis. Strict scrutiny is the highest standard of review a court will use to evaluate the constitutionality of government regulations; it is a very difficult standard to meet.

Due to these changes in First Amendment protections, many cities are facing legal challenges over their intimidating solicitation ordinances. For example, the City of Sacramento's aggressive solicitation ordinance was recently challenged by the ACLU. The United S...

Click here for full text